Accuracy of Self-Perceived Notion of Breast Most cancers Improvement Danger in Iranian Girls | BMC Girls’s Well being



  • 1.

    Bidoli E, Virdone S, Hamdi-Cherif M, Tofolutti F, Taborelli M, Panato C, et al. International age of onset of feminine breast most cancers: a 25-year population-based most cancers registry research Ettore. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 14111. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50680-5.

    CASE
    Merchandise
    PubMed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • 2.

    Mulshine JL, D’Amico TA. Issues with implementing a top quality lung most cancers screening program. CA Most cancers J Clin. 2014; 64 (5): 351–63.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 3.

    Sharif Nia H, Behmanesh F, Kwok C, Firouzbakht M, Ebadi A, Nikpour M. Questionnaire on beliefs in breast most cancers screening: psychometric properties of the Persian model. BMC Womens Well being. 2020; 20: 184.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 4.

    Mousavi SM, Gouya MM, Ramazani R, Davanlou M, Hajsadeghi N, Seddighi Z. Incidence and mortality of most cancers in Iran. Ann Oncol. 2009; 20: 556–63.

    CASE
    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 5.

    Taghavi IA, Fazeli Z, VahediBaghestaniPouhoseingholi MARA, Barzgar F, et al. Elevated pattern in breast most cancers mortality in Iran. Asian Pac J Most cancers Prev. 2012; 13: 367–70.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 6.

    Hajian-Tilaki KO, Ahangar T. Reproductive elements related to breast most cancers danger in northern Iran. Med Oncol. 2011; 28 (2): 441–6.

    CASE
    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 7.

    Hajian-Tilaki KO, Gholizadehpasha AR, Bozorgzadeh S, Hajian-Tilaki E. Physique mass index and waist circumference are predictors of breast most cancers danger in Iranian ladies. Med Oncol. 2011; 28: 1296-301.

    CASE
    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 8.

    Sweeney C, Baumgartner KB, Byers T, Giuliano AR, Herrick JS, Murtaugh MA, Slattery ML. Reproductive historical past associated to breast most cancers danger in Hispanic and non-Hispanic white ladies. Management of the causes of most cancers. 2008; 19: 391–401.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 9.

    Shantakumar S, Terry MB, Teitelbaum SL, et al. Reproductive elements and breast most cancers danger in older ladies. Therapy of breast most cancers. 2007; 102: 365–74.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • ten.

    Delavar MA, Hajian-Tilaki KO. Age of first menstruation in women born from 1985 to 1989 in Mazandaran, Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Well being J. 2008; 14 (1): 90–4.

    CASE
    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • 11.

    HajianTilaki Ok, Auladi S. Data, angle and observe of screening for breast most cancers in ladies, and related socio-demographic traits, in northern Iran. Iran J Most cancers Prev. 2015; 8 (4): e3429.

    Google Scholar

  • 12.

    Nikpour M, Hajian-Tilaki Ok, Bakhtiari A. Danger evaluation for the event of breast most cancers and its scientific impression on screening efficiency in Iranian ladies. Most cancers Mange Res. 2019; 9: 10073–82.

    Google Scholar

  • 13.

    Hajian-Tilaki Ok, Auladi S. Well being perception mannequin and observe of breast self-examination and breast most cancers screening in Iranian ladies. Breast most cancers. 2014; 21: 429–34.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 14.

    Brinton LA, Brown SL, Colton T, et al. Traits of a inhabitants of ladies with breast implants in comparison with ladies looking for different sorts of cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105 (3): 919–27.

    CASE
    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 15.

    Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, Corle DK, Inexperienced SB, Schairer C, Mulvihill JJ. To challenge the individualized odds of growing breast most cancers in white ladies who’re screened yearly. J Natl Most cancers Inst. 1989; 181: 1879–86.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 16.

    Chay WY, Ong WS, Tan PH, Jie Leo NQ, et al. Validation of the Gail mannequin to foretell particular person breast most cancers danger in a nationwide potential research of 28,104 Singaporean ladies. Breast most cancers Res. 2012; 14: R19.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 17.

    Champion VL. Improved devices for breast most cancers screening behaviors. Nurs Res. 1993; 42: 139–43.

    CASE
    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 18.

    Che Mohamed N, Moey SF, Lim BC. Validity and reliability of the Well being Perception Mannequin questionnaire to advertise breast self-examination and screening mammography for early detection of most cancers. Asian Pac J Most cancers Prev. 2019; 20 (9): 2865–73.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 19.

    Parsa P, Kandiah M, Mohd Nasir MT, Hejar AR, nor Afiah MZ. Reliability and validity of the Champion’s Well being Perception mannequin scale for breast most cancers screening in Malaysian ladies. Singapore Med J. 2008; 49 (11): 897–903.

    CASE

    Google Scholar

  • 20.

    Chung CW, Lee SJ. Estimated dangers and optimistic self-perception of breast most cancers danger in Korean ladies. Appl Nurs Res. 2013; 26 (4): 180–5.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 21.

    Çeber E, Soyer MT, Ciçeklioglu M, Cimat S. Breast most cancers danger evaluation and danger notion amongst nurses and midwives in Bornova well being district in Turkey. Most cancers nurse. 2006; 29 (3): 244–9.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 22.

    Fehniger J, Livaudais-Toman J, Karliner L, et al. Perceived breast most cancers versus goal, danger of breast most cancers in numerous ladies. J Girls’s well being (Larchmt). 2014; 23 (5): 420–7.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 23.

    Jones SC, Magee CA, Barrie LR, Iverson DC, Gregory P, Hanks EL, et al. Australian ladies’s perceptions of breast most cancers danger elements and the danger of growing breast most cancers. Girls’s well being points. 2011; 21 (5): 353–60.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 24.

    Nationwide Most cancers Institute, breast most cancers evaluation device. https://bcrisktool.most cancers.gov/calculator.html.

  • 25.

    Heidari Z, Feizi A. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Persian model of the Breast Most cancers Consciousness Measurement Questionnaire (BCAM). Most cancers Med. 2018; 7 (10): 5237-51.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 26.

    Linsell L, Forbes LJL, Burgess C, Kapari M, Thurnham A, Ramirez AJ. Validation of a measurement device to evaluate breast most cancers consciousness. Eur J Most cancers. 2010; 46 (8): 1374–81.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 27.

    Aduayi VA, Onayade AA, Aduayi OS, Odu OO. Relationship between self-perception and goal breast most cancers danger amongst ladies in rural and concrete communities in southwestern Nigeria. Int J Med Sci Public well being. 2015; 4 (10): 1.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 28.

    Calvocoressi L, Kasl SV, Lee CH, Stolar M, Claus EB, Jones BA. A potential research of perceived breast most cancers susceptibility and non-adherence to mammography screening tips in African American and white ladies aged 40 to 79. Most cancers Epidemiol Stop Biomark. 2004; 13 (12): 2096–105.

    Google Scholar

  • 29.

    Katapodi MC, Dodd MJ, Facione NC, Humphreys JC, Lee KA. Why some ladies have an optimistic or pessimistic bias about their breast most cancers danger: experiences, heuristics and information of danger elements. Most cancers nurse. 2010; 33 (1): 64–73.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 30.

    Banegas MP, Püschel Ok, Martínez-Gutiérrez J, Anderson JC, Thompson B. Evaluation of perceived and goal breast most cancers danger in Chilean ladies dwelling in an underserved space. Most cancers Epidemiol Stop Biomark. 2012; 21 (10): 1716–21.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 31.

    KartalOzcakarHatipoglu MNS, Neslisah TanDilek Gulda MA. Perceptions of breast most cancers danger amongst Turkish ladies attending major care: a cross-sectional research. BMC Girls’s Well being. 2014; 14: 152.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 32.

    Lee JM, Lowry KP, Chubiz JEC, Swan JS, Motazedi T, Halpern EF, et al. Breast Most cancers Danger, Fear and Anxiousness: Impact on Affected person Notion of False Constructive Screening Outcomes. The breast. 2020; 50: 104-12.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 33.

    Jones SC. Breast Most cancers Protection in Australian Print Media – Do Promoting and Editorial Protection Mirror the Proper Social Advertising Messages? J Well being Commun. 2004; 9 (4): 309–25.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 34.

    Davids SL, Schapira MM, McAuliffe TL, Nattinger AB. Predictors of pessimistic breast most cancers danger perceptions in a major care inhabitants. J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 19 (4): 310–5.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar

  • 35.

    Yazdani-Charati R, Hajian-Tilaki Ok, Sharbatdaran M. Comparability of pathological options of breast most cancers in youthful and older ladies. Caspian J Intern Med. 2019; 10910: 42–7.

    Google Scholar

  • 36.

    Cyrus-David MS. Data and readability of perceived private danger in underserved ladies who’re at elevated danger of breast most cancers. J Most cancers Educ. 2010; 25 (4): 617–23.

    Merchandise

    Google Scholar



  • Supply hyperlink

    Previous 2021 NFL Draft: Regardless of including JJ Watt, Arizona Cardinals defend closely in closing mock Fantasy Professional 2-round draft
    Next Political analogies danger misinterpreting historical past